Switzerland

Well if he's gonna be a two plank snob, I'll not be buying it :evil:

tino_11 wrote:Well if he's gonna be a two plank snob, I'll not be buying it :evil:

He's just starting out on his mission to save you from the excesses of the dark side.

Girls, no fighting please. I have no issues with boarders, but yes - the mag will have a skiing bias. No snobbery involved. Now, anyone.....Laax?

Since it will have a bias, which I presume means it's all about skiing with no boarding whatsoever, can I write a periodical boarding column, from a boarder who's trousers fit, wears skiing brands, and doesn't know quite what gnarly and rad mean?

tino_11 wrote: and doesn't know quite what gnarly and rad mean?

Can you explain those two terms please, some of us need help (well me really)
:mrgreen:

Obviously you cant read either, I just explained I have no idea )

tino_11 wrote:Obviously you cant read either, I just explained I have no idea )

Ah, sorry, I thought you were being ironic :oops:

Does, "whose trousers fit" mean that your trousers fit, or that you are a pants boarder?
I was under the impression that boarders' needed baggy pants, a chunky studded belt and some southern cleavage on display :?:

bandit wrote:

tino_11 wrote:Obviously you cant read either, I just explained I have no idea )

Ah, sorry, I thought you were being ironic :oops:

Does, "whose trousers fit" mean that your trousers fit, or that you are a pants boarder?
I was under the impression that boarders' needed baggy pants, a chunky studded belt and some southern cleavage on display :?:

Bandit,

Looking at some of your postings, in reply to Tino's, I think you would LIKE him to have his arse hanging out????!!!!!!!

MAybe just an impression though. )