Messages posted by : Iceman
nope arinsal, 1989 ;) |
|
|
Thats right Tony. I remember when I was learning to ski, doing the snow plough. Thought I was doing quite well, the instructor shouting, "snow plough!!!", to which I responded, "I bl**dy am!!!"
"NO, behind you!!!!" :oops: |
|
|
Rightly or wrongly, still stand by my original post. Unless an official is present, no one is getting my details.
Next time I fall over in the lift queue should I get everyone's details??? Like the point about the pencil - pun intended! |
|
|
I am sticking with the most sensible smartski rules :thumbup:
|
|
|
I think we are in danger if over complicating things.
1. Simple clash by accident. Can't see the point in exchanging details. I certainly won't 2. Incident like smartski, as above 3. Serious incident that involves blood wagons etc- I will give to the relevant authorities. I guess this is what the fis ruling is relating to? I imagine proving anything will be very difficult or even impossible. |
|
|
Can you imagine the difficulty of proving negligence on the slopes? Do you also stop witnesses?
|
|
Not sure about the last part if your statement, is this more likely in the litigation keen opposite side of the Atlantic? 'Where's there's blame there's a claim...' In Europe I have never seen such warnings, I am sure if there was a chance of that there would be warnings. I would never give out details, it presents an.opportunity for people to hunt you down Until it becomes law, like driving, I will never be doing it. |
|
|
Well......
|
|