Messages posted by : Timeforabeer
She obv needed to add 'get some' to her list(s). And ideally laminate it too... |
|
|
Are you insane?? Imagine all the hazards I would encounter if I was looking up at the sky!! Risk assessors everywhere would be having apoplexies....
|
|
|
Just popping out for lunch now, obviously I will be wearing my meteorite collision mitigation headgear.
|
|
|
Sorry to be slow, not made a study of your previous work.
|
|
I take your point... we could always do more to mitigate against potentially bad outcomes, but it comes down to personal choice and, to a degree, expedience. And for some people, it makes little sense to protect against an outcome they expect not to befall them. |
|
|
Unfortunately the 'outcome' which prompted all this discussion is the death of a woman who probably perceived the 'risk' to be pretty minimal.
I agree that the apocryphal tales of 'I know a bloke who...' warp the reality of the serious events per day of injury-free skiing. Now, no-one wants to take a risk assessor with them on holiday. So we either trust the bald stats that, on any given day, the risk of what we do is acceptable; or we over-compensate with bits of plastic and padding... |
|
|
There are plenty of idiots on the piste who make skiing just the little bit more dangerous, and in a recent weekend away I saw enough wince-inducing falls, some caused by third parties behaving irresponsibly, to come to the conclusion that no matter how cautiously I ski, my fate is out of my hands.
I have two sons, one wife, and a reasonable amount of people who seem to care after my wellbeing. I also have just the one head, and despite its meagre contents it's all I have to play with. Those who said that there is no way of telling if Natasha Richardson would have had a better chance of surviving a very undramatic fall if she were wearing a helmet are right; there is no way of telling. All these reasons are why I wear a helmet. |
|
|
Off to Les Gets day after tomorrow. Forecast is for 10 celsius. Grrrr.
|
|