Messages posted by : ise
Profile for ise > Messages posted by ise [1815]
That's exactly what I was thinking, on the one hand I can see that anyone wants to arrive with everything perfect. On the other, you can't help thinking just relaxing and getting on with it might not be a bad idea :D |
|
|
Some people are experimenting with binding positioning. You can say there's normally potentially three positions on many skis, male and female to reflect differences in balance and freeride/freestyle for difference in application.
I'm extremely dubious about this personally, the problem is that over a average day on a variety of terrain I doubt you can find a perfect position. If you spent all day carving on groomed piste I think you'd easily find a good position. Likewise any ski racer will benefit. It's largely a UK/US thing really, obsessing about kit in some way, in the Alpes you'll find most people just buy a pair of skis and go out and use them. If I wanted to mess around like this I'd probably need to go to Verbier and find a store that's used to dealing with English. That article makes some remarks about tester feedback for some very similar skis, I think that's all a red herring as well. If you test skis before you buy them then it's entirely irrelevant, you're going to buy the ones you ski best on. Mostly of course skis are bought based on the impression we're trying to give in the cable car :D |
|
That's why there's the common test that ellistine mentioned. Given those classic proportions Leonardo used in the Vitruvian man drawing I think your optimum pole length is going to be 70% of height, which should place the pole length at around your centre of gravity, how does that sound? :D (just for fun) |
|
which goes to show you know some strange people :D |
|
|
For most of us, slightly shorter is better, it helps us mortals bring our weight forward a bit. The measure you mention is good but take it as the max length in my opinion.
And mine ? Komperdell powerlock touring poles anywhere between 110 and 150 :D |
|
Not very well know outside Switzerland then :D I've never skied there personally although I keep meaning to take a look. You probably already know the main facts, there's three distinct areas, the Oeschinen which is pretty low topping out at around 1800m (I think from memory), Sunnbüel which is up around 2000m which has 4 or 5 blue runs and Lauchernalp which is actually a train ride through the Lötschental tunnel. The Lauchernalp area is altogether more substantial as a ski area, it's actually in the Valais on that side of the tunnel and I have skied here, technically to here from the Jungfrau though and I've no idea what the pistes are like. What's you plan? For her to take lessons? There's certainly more than enough skiing for a two week skier although you'd probably want to try all three areas. In that area Gstaad and Adelboden/Lenk are also worth a look. Obviously there's Grindelwald/Wengen etc but they're not the best ski stations in the Bernese Oberland by a long way despite their popularity. |
|
I think the only skiers who routinely wear some types of knee support are telemarkers with the obvious exception of anyone with existing injuries of course. I'm a bit dubious about the whole thing to be honest, there's a high incidence of wrist injuries for beginner snowboarders measured around the world so it's prudent to take some precaution, likewise there's some uncomfortable mild injuries that beginner 'boarders commonly suffer from that are preventable with some padding. I'd probably try and focus in on the instruction and forget the protection, it sounds like your GF might have a confidence problem after that fall so a private instructor might work well? |
|
That might work but there's a problem there as well, the separate wrist guards you can get won't fit inside a "normal" ski glove unless you oversize the glove considerably and then you're going to struggle with the pole again although this time it's a compromise rather than close to impossible. |
|
Profile for ise > Messages posted by ise [1815]