Is buying a ski clothing package good value or not?
LoginStarted by Pippak in Ski Chatter 08-Jan-2010 - 17 Replies
Pippak posted Jan-2010
Daved
reply to 'Is buying a ski clothing package good value or not?' posted Jan-2010
Tony_H
reply to 'Is buying a ski clothing package good value or not?' posted Jan-2010
Depends on what is on offer specifically and at what price?pauline kay wrote:My daughter and I are going skiing for the first time at the end of January and we don't want to spend a fortune on ski wear. There are some very reasonable deals on ski clothing packages, ie jacket, pants, gloves and under layer but is this false economy? Any advice would be appreciated.
Peakmonster
reply to 'Is buying a ski clothing package good value or not?' posted Jan-2010
shouldnt cost you a fortune and you get to choose what you like rather than being restricted by whats on the offer you mention.
NellyPS
reply to 'Is buying a ski clothing package good value or not?' posted Jan-2010
TheSkiingGolfer
reply to 'Is buying a ski clothing package good value or not?' posted Jan-2010
We've been to TK Maxx this week and it is a good bet for value stuff it seems. The trespass gear seems the cheapest and looks/feels quality too. i just got jacket and sallopets(i'm sure i'm spelling that different each time i post a message! lol) for £50
My advice would be (not that i feel in any way wualified to offer it!) try it all on in their fitting rooms, buy it, try it on at home...you've got 14 days to take it all back anyway. The only problem we've found is we're both a little bit between sizes and the womens stuff is mostly sized just S,M,L etc and not 10,12,14 though there are some sized in the numbers so we've have struggled to find what feels like a really good fit.
Good luck, hope you enjoy your holiday
Tony_H
reply to 'Is buying a ski clothing package good value or not?' posted Jan-2010
Perhaps they could fill us in first?
RoseR
reply to 'Is buying a ski clothing package good value or not?' posted Jan-2010
Topic last updated on 10-January-2010 at 18:41
