|
Pavelski gave a good short history of the development of parallel skiing. The stem christie was aimed at a middle step between snowplough and parallel. The problem was that a lot of skiers remained locked in the stem process, because they perceived an issue of retaining balance by progressing to parallel.
We used, with reasonable success, to cut out the christie phase, through a process of cross-hill traverse stops, progressing to an "Open knee swing". That is using a change of terrain to assist in the initiation of the turn, skis parallel, shoulder width apart. It works well, but is difficult for beginners to grasp. This was in effect a carved turn, but it took a lot of ground, and was only any use on slight slopes. Shorter skis and changed camber has made this process easier to achieve.
Enlightment only really occured when the pupil grasped the technique of heel slip, which, then allied with the parallel turn gave the combination of ability, control and confidence.
Incidentally, there was a period in the early 70's when we were mandated to teach downward unweighting, called "Avaloment" in the France and "Grundschwung" in the Austrian ski school. High backed boots quickly appeared followed by rickety knees! It developed into an extreme form, termed "Jetting", sitting down on a snow bump, twisting the knees, and jetting the skis away! I remember bolting 8 inch vertical extensions to the back of my boots!
Having said all that, there are occasions when downward unweighting is rewarded.
I agree with ski53 and ben76 that carving is a parallel action. Also, there is nothing wrong with "knees together", it is a style variation along with the rest.
And if more girls skied with their legs together......
Dave Mac
|